Google's Ad-Privacy Changes Fall Short, U.K. Regulator Says in Internal Documents


The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has raised concerns about Google’s proposed replacements for third-party cookies, stating that they have potential gaps that could be exploited by advertisers.

In a draft report obtained by the Financial Times, the ICO highlighted several issues with Google’s Privacy Sandbox, which is intended to provide a more privacy-friendly alternative to the use of third-party cookies for targeted advertising.

One of the main concerns raised by the ICO is that Google’s proposals could lead to user tracking and profiling, as well as the potential for data breaches. The regulator also noted that the Privacy Sandbox may not provide users with sufficient control over their data and could result in a lack of transparency around how their information is being used.

The ICO’s draft report comes as Google faces increasing scrutiny over its data practices and the impact of its dominant position in the online advertising market. The tech giant has been under pressure to address privacy concerns and comply with regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

In response to the ICO’s findings, Google has stated that it is committed to working with regulators and industry partners to address the concerns raised in the draft report. The company has also emphasized that it is continuously refining its proposals for the Privacy Sandbox to ensure that they meet the highest standards of privacy and security.

Despite Google’s assurances, the ICO’s draft report highlights the challenges that the tech giant faces in developing privacy-friendly alternatives to third-party cookies. As regulators and privacy advocates continue to push for greater transparency and control over online data practices, it is clear that Google will need to address the gaps identified by the ICO in order to gain widespread acceptance of its proposed replacements for cookies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *